Haia connects business intent, policy, execution and records into one operational state — so complex money movement no longer depends on people stitching the picture together.
Across major financial jurisdictions, regulated institutions are increasingly expected to understand critical services and operations end to end — including the systems and third parties that support them.
Know which business services and operations must continue.
Understand the people, processes, technology, data and systems that jointly deliver them.
Using a provider does not automatically transfer the regulated institution's accountability.
Determine whether the operation or service can still be delivered through severe disruption.
Banks should identify critical operations and map the people, technology, processes, information, facilities and internal/external interdependencies needed to deliver them, including third-party dependencies.
Scope International supervisory principles for banks; not a universal global statute.
Primary sourceThe interagency paper brings together existing expectations around critical operations, core business lines, tolerance for disruption, interconnections and significant third-party dependencies.
Scope Directed to the largest and most complex domestic banking organizations; the paper itself does not create new regulation or guidance.
Primary sourceDORA requires in-scope financial entities to manage ICT risk and third-party dependencies around critical or important functions and maintain responsibility for their own regulatory obligations.
Scope Applies to the financial entities defined in DORA; do not generalize it to every EU business.
Primary sourceFirms in scope must identify important business services, set impact tolerances and map the people, processes, technology, facilities, information and relevant third parties needed to deliver them.
Scope Applies to firms within the FCA operational-resilience scope; scope is not universal across all UK companies.
Primary sourceMAS guidance frames resilience around critical business services and dependency mapping across the functions, processes and resources that support them, including relevant third parties.
Scope Supervisory guidance for financial institutions; not a general statutory requirement for all Singapore companies.
Primary sourceAuthorized Institutions are expected to identify critical operations, understand underlying interconnections and dependencies, and maintain resilience through business-continuity and third-party dependency management.
Scope HKMA supervisory guidance for Authorized Institutions.
Primary sourceAPRA-regulated entities must manage operational risk, maintain critical operations within tolerance levels through severe disruptions, and manage risks arising from service providers.
Scope Current CPS 230 is in force from 1 July 2026 for the APRA-regulated entities defined by the standard.
Primary sourceOSFI states that operational resilience requires an end-to-end view of critical operations and mapping of people, technology, processes, information, facilities, third parties and the dependencies among them.
Scope Applies to the federally regulated financial institutions listed in Guideline E-21, on a risk-based and proportionate basis.
Primary sourceInstitutions must identify critical functions and tolerances for disruption, maintain an inventory of connections and dependencies between critical processes and resources, and test delivery within tolerance under severe but plausible scenarios.
Scope Applies within the scope defined by FINMA Circular 2023/1; do not generalize beyond covered supervised institutions.
Primary sourceLicensed Financial Institutions must identify and manage risks to Critical Operations and integrate third-party arrangements affecting Critical Operations into their operational-resilience and operational-risk frameworks.
Scope C 1/2026 is in force from 14 September 2026 and applies to Licensed Financial Institutions within the CBUAE Rulebook scope.
Primary sourceLocal systems establish authoritative facts. Regulators increasingly expect institutions to understand the critical service or operation those systems collectively support.
Because local systems prove their piece. Your business is accountable for the outcome.
System states are evidence. The business operation is the unit of control.
Local systems keep their authority. Haia keeps the complete operation together across them.

Haia turns fragmented state into an owned, evidenced and bounded next action — including prerequisites, constraints and the authority required to proceed.

Policy evaluation · identity and access · approvals · audit trail · evidence.


See events and evidence in the context of the business outcome they belong to.
Carry ownership, policy and expected outcome alongside the movement of money.
Make unresolved work visible and move the operation toward completion.
Turn outcomes and exceptions into better future decisions.
Banks, wallets, stablecoin rails, payment providers, ledgers and internal systems each remain authoritative for their piece. The enterprise still has to keep the complete operation together across them.
Keep every specialist system doing what it does best. Haia connects the operation across them.
Treasury / liquidity / settlement remains the primary validation lane. The same control pattern can extend to enterprise payout completion and platform funding / withdrawal / multi-party payout operations.
Bring us one operation your team still has to reconstruct manually. We’ll show you what changes when the whole operation can be seen and managed as one.